Publisher’s Note: I saw an article in the front page of the Los Angeles Times called, “cut-rate fertility: making children a commodity”, about doctors who do fertility work very inexpensively by giving away people’s eggs from a communal pool of fertilized eggs. This method is apparently less costly than the IVF process. As usual with high-tech reproduction, what is left out of the process are the needs of the children, this time taking backseat to prospective parents and the doctors who sell their product. I asked adoption and high-tech reproduction expert Kris Probasco, to comment on this phenomena and this is her answer. –—————-—–————-————-————-————-————-————-————-————-——————- This is in response to the article, “Ethical debate over embryos on the cheap”. The article states that Dr. Ernest Zeringue is man-making embryos through egg donation and sperm donation to create a product that is more reasonable than an IVF process. The embryos are created in batches, frozen, and wait for several families to receive these embryos. What is completely left out is that embryos create children, and children have life-long needs connected to their social, emotional and medical identity. We learned from the history of adoption which has a very dark past where the Read more